ADAM THE ARYAN

a adame and eve

Adam and Eve, the roots of the Aryan tree.

Adamites

Only very recently has it been taught that the races of man originated from the same ancestor. This certainly doesn’t have any Biblical origin, although the leaders of the apostate Church would like people to think it did. In their misplaced desire to make the contents of the Bible applicable to everyone, they have neglected to properly investigate the definition of the term ‘Adam’, or what the Hebrew word translated throughout the Bible as ‘man’ is.

The Hebrew word ‘Adam’, which gets translated as ‘man’ and ‘mankind’ throughout our English Bibles, actually has another definition that identifies exactly which particular type of what we call today ‘man’, is being talked about. Strong’s Bible Concordance lists the two definitions for Adam:

120 Adam – Man, Human Being, Mankind, Husbandman

121 Adam – Red Earth or Ruddy Skin Colour

The word ‘ruddy’ means ‘having a fresh, healthy red colour’, and is associated with the ability to blush. There is only one type of man that has ruddy cheeks and is capable of blushing and that is the white man.

‘Blushing’ is a hot, red flushing of the cheeks unique to white people when they feel humility, shame or embarrassment, and is often associated with an inability to hold the head up and bear another’s gaze. Darwin described blushing as ‘the most peculiar and most human of all expressions’.

The Apocryphal text, ‘The Testament of Judah’ associates blushing with the spirit of truth:

50 And the spirit of truth testifieth all things, and accuseth all; and the sinner is burnt up by his own heart, and cannot raise his face to the judge.

When the Adam was created from the dust of the earth, the LORD God breathed ‘the breath of life’ into his nostrils and he became ‘a living soul’. The Adam was unique in this, as the other creatures in Genesis were made only from the earth or the waters, yet the Adam was supplemented with the breath of life. Breath is synonymous with spirit, as life is with truth, so the breath of life is another way of saying the spirit of truth.

The LORD God’s breathing into the nostrils also caused the Adam’s chest cavity and lung capacity to expand. The effect of this means that the white man can float with little effort in water, while the black race sinks.

Something else I have noticed that the spirit of truth appears to have bestowed upon the white man, is the ability to dowse. Dowsing for water and other objects seems to be a gift that is only accessible to the Adam. It prevented the Negro from being able to cross the deserts in Africa until relatively recently, and I have searched among dowsers for evidence of any negro practitioners, but to no avail.

a lord god breath

The LORD God breathes the breath of life into the Adam’s nostrils, making him a living soul.

Throughout the Bible there are physical descriptions of the descendants of Adam, making point of the fact that they were white, ruddy, and could blush.

Lamentations ch 4 v 7
Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire.

Song of Solomon ch 5 v 10
My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.

Jeremiah ch 30 v 6
Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child? wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?

Isaiah ch 29 v 22
Therefore thus saith the LORD, who redeemed Abraham, concerning the house of Jacob, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, neither shall his face now wax pale.

Ezra ch 9 v 6
And said, O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens.

 Jeremiah ch 6 v 15
Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD.

1 Samuel ch 16 v 12
And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.

When the white race adulterates its blood with the dark races, the ability to blush is lost in the offspring. I personally know of four generations that this has held true for, even though each generation looked white, and came from breeding with whites.

From the Biblical evidence and from observation, this implies that all those white people today who can still blush, have a direct and pure bloodline going all the way back to the patriarch of the white race.

Christ talks of time being shortened in the last days, because if it were not, no flesh would be saved, as even the elect would be deceived. I believe that the white race that have remained pure all this time are the elect. Our brothers from the past fell from grace, interbred with the other races and are no longer here with us at the end times. When the devout of our ancestors realized what was happening to the white race in India, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Palestine, Persia, Assyria and elsewhere, they fled to where they could be certain that the blood had remained pure, the colder climates of Europe.

a haplogroups

Area and density of haplogroup R1 shows that previous areas containing Aryan civilizations became diluted, with the strongest concentration moving to Europe.

Non-Adamites

So if the other races cannot claim descent from Adam, then where is the reference to them being created in the Bible? There are two words in our English Bibles that appear to refer to the other races. One of these words is ‘creature’, and the other is ‘beast’. Among the Strong’s definitions for them are these:

5315 Creature – A creature or person as a whole, self, body, even corpse:-soul, man, persons, beast, moving creature.

2416 Beast, commonly referred to as ‘the beast of the field’ – Family, kin, band, army, living creature, living thing.

There are many verses in the Bible that confirm that the ‘beast of the field’ refers to other bipeds, and that the Adam is seperate from them:

Genesis ch 9 v 5
And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man.

Exodus ch 22 v 9
Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.

Leviticus ch 18 v 23
Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion. (confusion of the kinds)

Jeremiah ch 21 v 6
And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and beast: they shall die of a great pestilence.

Ezekiel ch 29 v 11
No foot of man shall pass through it, nor foot of beast shall pass through it, neither shall it be inhabited forty years.

Jonah ch 3 v 8
But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.

Zechariah ch 8 v 10
For before these days there was no hire for man, nor any hire for beast; neither was there any peace to him that went out or came in because of the affliction: for I set all men every one against his neighbour.

Jeremiah ch 27 v 6
And now have I given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant; and the beasts of the field have I given him also to serve him.

Joel ch 1 v 20
The beasts of the field cry also unto thee: for the rivers of waters are dried up, and the fire hath devoured the pastures of the wilderness.

 Zechariah ch 14 v 15
And so shall be the plague of the horse, of the mule, of the camel, and of the ass, and of all the beasts that shall be in these tents, as this plague. (underlining and brackets mine)

The writers of the Bible had no concept of ‘races’, ‘human beings’, or ‘the brotherhood of man’, all they knew of were the Nations that descended from Adam, and the people who were not , who they called ‘the beasts of the field’. The Indo-Aryan writers were similar in this respect, calling the beasts ‘our two legged animals’ and referring to themselves as ‘the twice born’. Possibly in reference to them being born from the heavens, as well as from the earth.

a adam and eve

99% of all representations of Adam and Eve accurately portray them as white. How could their descendants possibly be anything else?

The Elect

Adam alone was created ‘in the image of God’. All the other creatures were created in their kinds and were made entirely from the already created earth or waters. The first chapter of Genesis repeats the instruction for everyone to produce ‘after their kind’ nine times. This is then reinforced by God blessing the world and pronouncing it very good. There was no evil in the world while the kinds only reproduced after their own kind.

Adam was special, he was given the breath of life, made into a living soul, and given dominion over everything that God had made from the earth and the waters. He was put at the top of the hierarchy and even tested to see whether he understood his position and the uniqueness of his kind: The LORD God states that he will create a helpmeet for Adam, then parades the beasts of the field in front of him who Adam refuses as a helpmeet, choosing to exercise his dominion by naming them instead.

The LORD God then makes a helpmeet for him from Adam’s own flesh, and Adam declaresTherefore shall a man (an Adam) leave his father and his mother, and cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.’

Saint Paul reminds us of this verse thousands of years later where he says ‘All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.’ 1 Corinthians ch 15 v 39.

Through God’s grace the Adam was given something more precious than anything else on earth. This was reflected in his flesh, in his ability to blush, and in the name he was given. It would identify him for all time through his descendants features. This gift enabled him to be able to subdue the earth and make it serve him. It united him to his God and gave him a direct route to attain communion with him. This gift is what has inspired the White man to create every civilization known to history. It is the reason why even the lowest strata from a White society can be uprooted and stranded in a wilderness, yet still succeed in taming it and making it flower. It meant that the Adam could survive and adapt to any conditions, bending nature to his will with his holy dispensation.

It is no surprise that there is so much promotion of race mixing today to the white race, as we are the oldest and the most blessed part of it. We have endured all this time since Adam, rejecting the temptation to blaspheme the living soul that breathes within us. We have outlasted the corrupted civilizations of old and maintained our purity, while our brothers descended into licentiousness with beasts and neglected to pass the torch on to their children. Our ancestors however did not despise their birthright, and the torches that we now carry are the oldest and most potent of all. We have resisted the longest out of all the children that came from Adam, and we are now facing nothing that we haven’t defeated before. Never forget that we are the elect, our roots begin with Adam, and as long as we are still a part of his unique tree, that precious gift he was given remains ours too.

Sven Longshanks

More information:

Christogenea – Christian Identity Website

Daily Stormer – Pro-White News from a traditionalist Christian perspective

Covenant Publishing – Booksellers in Britain

Artisan Publishers – Booksellers in America

16 thoughts on “ADAM THE ARYAN

  1. Just wanted to say I’m really impressed by how you tied all the history here together into a coherent narrative. I am amazed! Thank you for taking the time to create and present your work.

    • I am so delighted that God has given you the intelligence that i fully comprehend a question that has been with me for years–concerning the beast. From the best of Christians i have been ostracized and socially abused, because i could not accept that this so called beast could possibly come through Eve. I was tried by a high council of twelve priesthood holders and ex-communicated. I stood before this group and asked one question. The answer was a yes or no. I did not reply. This has never bothered me, for in my heart and soul the spirit of God was with me and the Holy Ghost confirmed that i was innocent as charged.

      • did you ever stop to think (and this is the only way it could happen, since the name Adam, came BEFORE the hebrew word “adamah”)…that that word derives from the fact that Adam was embarrased after realizing he was naked after eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil????

      • Yeah, I have thought about that before, but he was given the name Adam, before he ate the fruit.

        I guess he was named after the blushing that he would do in the future.

  2. The interpretation of ‘beast of the field’ being ‘other bipeds’ or ‘non-Adamic’ is totally incorrect. The beast of the field are the Aryan nations that Adam was placed to rule over. Several places in scripture Israel are called beast of the field, and YHWH made explicit covenants with the beast of the field. This sacred cow of identity theology needs to be laid to rest. It is all ‘fleshed out’ here in an essay, THE MYSTERY OF THE BEAST OF THE FIELD: http://whiterace.org/el/mystery-of-the-beast-of-the-field/

    • It is also used as a pejorative, like when you call someone a pig, or a dog.

      All the White nations were descended from Shem, Ham and Japhet and the beast of the field were around for a long time before them.

      It wasnt just the Bible that refers to the other races as ‘beasts’, Flavius Josephus does also, and just like in the Bible, he does not think it proper to give the collective names by which they were known by. ‘Nations’ is a word that should be used to describe only the White nations only.

      According to your theory then there are no beasts of the field left, since all the other White nations are now extinct.

      • The ignorance of Christian Identity dogma is stultifying. The scripture clearly shows YHWH made a covenant with the beast of the field, that he would never utterly destroy them.

        You just directly contradicted the scripture. You seem to think that all the beast of the field were extinct from the flood. That’s not what the scripture says. The Word says that Noah took of every clean beast by SEVENS into the Ark with him. Noah preserved a confederation of Seventy-two nations while the rest of the world turned into desolation. After Noah came out of the Ark, and brought the beasts out with him, the scripture says that YHWH made a covenant WITH THE BEAST OF THE FIELD:

        Christian Identity refuses to answer how and why YHWH made an ETERNAL covenant with the Beast of the Field, that they would never be destroyed by war (flood):

        “And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth. And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.”

        YHWH repeats several times that he made a covenant with the Beast of the earth! And this covenant is that he will never destroy them completely.

        YHWH made a covenant with the Beast Nations! They were in the ark with Noah. Noah was the Ruler of a confederation of nations. The individualistic, micromanagerial interpretation of Christian Identity is bunk.

        Genesis 9 debunks Christian Identity’s interpretation. There YHWH makes a covenant with the beasts. YHWH made a covenant with the beast of the earth in Genesis 9, yet Christian Identity tell you they are negroes. Did Noah have negroes with himself on the ark? Did YHWH make a covenant with negroes? Christian Identity, are you serious?

        Thus, the Idea that all white nations are descended only from Noah’s three sons, is just more See-Eyer fable! The beasts in the Ark were Adamic nations. Noah is the Emperor! Noah is the Aristocracy over all the Aryan nations. The Ark was a confederation of nations. The flood was a war. The living creatures with the breath of life are nations and the Aristocracy of Adam that governs them. The Adamites are only one particular family within the white race. Most white people were not Adamite! Only Noah’s family was. Yet all the others were the same Aryan race.

        The problem with Christian Identity is they pick and choose what parts of the scripture they want to be symbolic or literal. You can conform any preconcieved notions you want into the scripture by simply choosing which you want to be literal or figurative. Christian Identity has absolutely no knowledge of ancient Hebrew scripture. Strong’s concordance does not make you a Hebraist! Strong’s concordance is full of errors. Strong’s promotes the same errors as the King James Team, for it is based on the KJV interpretation of Hebrew. You actually have to understand a survey of the ancient languages en toto, through philological study, to even begin to see what the writers were actually conveying. Just as having a Chilton’s Mechanic manual to a 1993 Mazda truck does not make you a mechanic, holding a Strong’s Concordance does not make you competent student of the Hebrew language of scripture. Christian Identity has bamboozled thousands into thinking their expositions of Hebrew are scholarly, when it’s mostly complete bull**** that takes in the unwary.

        The Hebrew words for nations is the same word translated as beast, cattle, herds, flocks. It’s a no-brainer that this has no pejorative intent whatsoever. That is a Christian Identity invention. The beasts are MASCOTS, not pejorative insults. Just like sports teams have mascots, or states have a mascot, state bird, or state animal, each nation of Genesis has a particular critter as its MASCOT.

        A series of essays on the link below shows where Christian Identity took the truth of God’s word and simply turned it into Judaism for white men. I hope you will read them. You can never come before the face of YHWH through Christian Identity. Being white is not enough. There is only one family in the Aryan peoples who will rule. That is the Israel of God.

        http://whiterace.org/el/index.php?s=beast+of+the+field

  3. You seem to be trying to put words into my mouth that I haven’t spoken. Here is a paste from a previous article of mine covering the points you mention.

    The History of The Mixed-Race Peoples

    A question I had for some time which I was unable to answer, was why are there so many mixed-race peoples about, why were there still mixed-race people around after the flood? My line of thinking was that if the flood was due to race-mixing, then surely it would have wiped all the hybrids out and thus prevented any chance of it occurring again to the nations descended from Noah. As usual, it was my thinking that was wrong, rather than the Bible.

    If God is just, and we are told that God is just, then he would not punish those who had been sinned against, he would only punish the sinners themselves. Therefore, it would only have been the Adamites who had bred with beasts that were destroyed in the flood, and not the hybrid offspring themselves. This appears to be confirmed in Genesis ch 7 v 4 where it specifies that it is ‘every living substance that I have made’ that is to be destroyed, which infers that there is also living substance which he had not made. Genesis ch 9 v 10 also has God making a covenant with ‘from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth’ which seems to be saying that there were beasts of the earth that were not in the ark with Noah. It was this promise that prevented him from destroying the half-breed Canaanites with a catastrophe later on.

    The survival of the half-breeds also answers another question, why were the offspring of Ham opposed to God, and why did some of the Adamites start race-mixing again after the flood? Ham may well have had a grudge against God for destroying his ancestors instead of the half man/half beasts they had generated, and this would have continued as a character trait in the nations descended from him. The beasts themselves would have been unattractive to the Hamites but some of the half-castes were alluring enough to seduce them, eventually leading to them being entirely consumed by the adulterated blood.

    Since God is just, this must have been the reason why he commanded the Israelites to destroy even the little children of the Canaanites in the land. It was impossible for them to ever produce good fruit as a nation, since they had no divine origin, being the offspring of Canaan and the beasts that were created by his ancestors. As fully grown individuals, each one of them had the potential to poison the fruit of an entire branch of the Israelite race for ever more. Rather than have them produce pass-for-white races that would gradually replace the pure white races through amalgamation, they had to be wiped out.

    The temptation to breed with the hybrids was too much for all but the most righteous of the early Adamites. Noah alone had found favour with God through being pure in his generations, the rest of the children of Seth had all given in to their desire for strange flesh, something that was to end up being repeated by all the White Nations that followed, with the exception of the last surviving one, the European. God had tried setting an example by punishing the perpetrators of the crime, but still his creation continued to fall to the temptation. In the end it comes down to a case of either the mixed-race peoples were all pushed out of the land the pure races occupied, or the Adamites would be blended out, so he had to put his beloved creation first and commanded the people he chose for the job, the tribes of Israel, to destroy the mixed-race Canaanites. He could not do this himself, as he had promised never again to destroy all life in the earth.

    The race-mixing had got so bad in some areas after the flood that Lot’s daughters thought they were the only Adamites left. They ended up having to drug and rape their father to ensure that the seed produced was not adulterated. They knew that even incest was preferable to despising the image of God and creating hybrid man/beast offspring. The same is recorded happening with the earliest Buddhists, in order to keep their nation going when they had only small numbers, they resorted to consanguineous marriage, rather than risk adulterating the blood of their descendants. Despite having unwittingly produced children with his daughters, Lot is still recorded as being righteous. Flavius Josephus has God saying that if there had been one righteous man in Sodom he would have forgiven his sins then and there. So being righteous can have nothing to do with how many sins someone has committed, rather it is to do with their loyalty to their race. This is confirmed when Noah is described as righteous before God, when all we know about Noah is that he was ‘perfect in his generations’. It is clearly possible for God to forgive the sins of his own creation, but it is not possible for him to forgive the sins of someone else’s creation, he has no part in it, literally. Does man have the power to forgive the sins of his bastard creations? Man doesn’t even have the power to forgive his own sins, let alone anyone else’s.

    Jude makes it clear that the people of Sodom were guilty of going after strange flesh – race mixing, which he calls ‘fornication’. Fornication is sex outside of lawful marriage and lawful marriage is marriage between one kind of flesh only, as defined in Genesis. If the marriage is between two different kinds of flesh, then the generation has two fathers and is a bastard by natural law. As marriage became more about the ceremony and the signing of a contract than the act itself, the definition of the word changed, along with the associated terms ‘fornication’ and ‘bastard’. If marriage were just about a piece of paper and a ceremony, then all the animals would be fornicating, producing bastard offspring and spiting God, which they are obviously not doing. Unless the animals have been forced by man to breed with a different kind, then they are not fornicating, how could they be, when fornication is a sin?

    From

    Fascovereign.blogspot.co.uk – Positive X Negative = Negative

  4. Quote:
    ‘The Hebrew words for nations is the same word translated as beast, cattle, herds, flocks.’

    Nation: ‘Goy’
    Strongs Concordance no.1471
    people, nation, regularly in the OT, any people in contrast to Israel: the Gentiles, pagan, heathen, uncultured: nations (265), heathen (143), nation (107), Gentiles (30), people (11), every nation (4), another (1).

    Nowhere does the word nation ever mean beasts. I dont know where you would ever get that idea from.

    Interestingly the word ‘nations’ from Genesis ch 25 v 23 is left out in my Strongs Concordance. Could this be because it clearly shows that Jacob Israel was a Goy himself?

    ‘And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.’

    Referring to Jacob and Esau.

  5. “all those white people today who can still blush, have a direct and pure bloodline going all the way back to the patriarch of the white race.”

    so koreans,japanese and chinese are pure white since they blush

    • Your comment doesnt make a lot of sense.

      Where are Koreans, Japenese or Chinese classified as being White people?

      I would also suggest that they do not blush and there is no evidence that you could put forward to show that they do. Blushing is caused by shame and embarrassment and although there is evidence that they may feel these emotions, there is no evidence to show their features demonstrate it by showing the blood in the cheeks.

      They might be lighter skinned, but so are albino negroes and they dont blush either.

    • Hilarious.

      If you are Black, dont bother to comment again, I do not see any point in even entering a dialogue with you. It is just casting pearls before swine and dogs.

      If you are White, then take a look at their ‘evidence’ it is based upon such Negro logic as since an area has Blacks and Arabs in it now, it must have had Negroes in it 2,000 years ago. They think that Romans, Vandals, Carthaginians and Phoenicians in Africa must have all been Negroes just because they were born in Africa. It is quite hilarious when you look at how their own native languages show they have no capacity for abstract thought, that they could be so stupid as to think they would be capable of writing scripture. They never even invented the wheel or a sea-worthy boat, let alone a written language. Just thinking in terms of yesterday and tomorrow is beyond their capabilities, but they are very good mimics, which is where the term to ‘ape’ someone comes from.

      This book here tells you where the Negro appears in the Bible:

      The Negro, a Beast or in the Image of God?

      • I am a Caucasian , sir. I argue with the Black Hebrew Israelites all the time. The data you provided in the article had assisted me greatly.
        I was merely curious if you were aware of the above mentioned organization and if you had a response to them. I’ve thought about writing an entire book debunking them.

        I own an original copy of the volume you mentioned. I have yet to read it however. Thank you for the link. Given how fragile the book is, it might be more ideal to read it online.

        Have a great day. God bless.

  6. @ race white

    Explain this?

    And after some days my son, Methuselah, took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him and bore him a son. And his body was white as snow and red as a rose; the hair of his head as white as wool and his demdema (‘long curly hair’) beautiful; and as for his eyes, when he opened them the whole house glowed like the sun …

    And his father, Lamech, was afraid of him and fled and went to Methuselah his father; and he said to him,
    “I have begotten a strange son. He is not like an (ordinary) human being, but he looks like the children of the angels of heaven to me, his form is different, and he is not like us … It does not seem to me that he is of me, but of angels..

    Interesting, because pilate explains yeshua in a similar way:

    One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!

    Another description of Jesus is found in “The Archko Volume” which contains official court documents from the days of Jesus. This information substantiates that He came from racial lines which had blue eyes and golden hair. In a chapter entitled “Gamaliel’s Interview” it states concerning Jesus (Yeshua) appearance:

    “I asked him to describe this person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. He said: ‘If you ever meet him [Yeshua] you will know him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy….’ This Jew [Nazarite] is convinced that he is the Messiah of the world. …this was the same person that was born of the virgin in Bethlehem some twenty-six years before…”

    Some variations say red hair a ruddy countenance and blue eyes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s